About
Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations
Not Even Wrong: The Book
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 664 other subscribersRecent Comments
- Living in a Post-truth World 47
Ashley, John Pohl, Rich Townsend, Peter, Low Math, Meekly Interacting, Georg [...] - The Crisis in String Theory is Worse Than You Think... 41
Scott Caveny, Matthew Foster, Peter Woit, SDR, Marvin, Low+Math,+Meely+Interacting [...] - Various Items 15
Stephane Dubedat, Peter Woit, Pasquale Di Cesare, Andrew, Mathematician, James [...] - All Langlands, all the time 7
toto, Peter Woit, Jim+Eadon, kitchin, Peter Woit, Quasiparticular [...] - Is Spacetime Unraveling? 19
Peter Woit, Marty, Peter Woit, Bertie, Mathias, Mark Hillery [...]
- Living in a Post-truth World 47
Categories
- abc Conjecture (21)
- Book Reviews (122)
- BRST (13)
- Euclidean Twistor Unification (15)
- Experimental HEP News (153)
- Fake Physics (8)
- Favorite Old Posts (50)
- Film Reviews (15)
- Langlands (52)
- Multiverse Mania (163)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (27)
- Obituaries (35)
- Quantum Mechanics (23)
- Quantum Theory: The Book (7)
- Strings 2XXX (27)
- Swampland (20)
- This Week's Hype (141)
- Uncategorized (1,291)
- Wormhole Publicity Stunts (15)
Archives
Links
Mathematics Weblogs
- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Anton Hilado
- Cathy O'Neil
- Daniel Litt
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- David Roberts
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Harald Helfgott
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Persiflage
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Silicon Reckoner
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers
- Xena Project
Physics Weblogs
- Alexey Petrov
- AMVA4NewPhysics
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Geoffrey Dixon
- Georg von Hippel
- Jacques Distler
- Jess Riedel
- Jim Baggott
- John Horgan
- Lubos Motl
- Mark Goodsell
- Mark Hanman
- Mateus Araujo
- Matt Strassler
- Matt von Hippel
- Matthew Buckley
- Peter Orland
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder
- Scott Aaronson
- Sean Carroll
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Stacy McGaugh
- Tommaso Dorigo
Some Web Pages
- Alain Connes
- Arthur Jaffe
- Barry Mazur
- Brian Conrad
- Brian Hall
- Cumrun Vafa
- Dan Freed
- Daniel Bump
- David Ben-Zvi
- David Nadler
- David Vogan
- Dennis Gaitsgory
- Eckhard Meinrenken
- Edward Frenkel
- Frank Wilczek
- Gerard ’t Hooft
- Greg Moore
- Hirosi Ooguri
- Ivan Fesenko
- Jacob Lurie
- John Baez
- José Figueroa-O'Farrill
- Klaas Landsman
- Laurent Fargues
- Laurent Lafforgue
- Nolan Wallach
- Peter Teichner
- Robert Langlands
- Vincent Lafforgue
Twitter
Videos
Monthly Archives: April 2017
Why String Theory is Still Not Even Wrong
John Horgan recently sent me some questions, and has put them and my answers up at his Scientific American site, under the title Why String Theory is Still Not Even Wrong. My thanks to him for the questions and for … Continue reading
Posted in Fake Physics, Multiverse Mania
37 Comments
Two Pet Peeves
I was reminded of two of my pet peeves while taking a look at the appendix A of this paper. As a public service to physicists I thought I’d go on about them here, and provide some advice to the … Continue reading
Posted in Favorite Old Posts, Uncategorized
28 Comments
Quick Links
A few quick items: I was very sorry to hear recently of the death of David Goss (obituary here), a mathematician specialist in function fields who was at Ohio State. David had a side interest in physics and was a … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
22 Comments
The Social Bubble of Physics
Sabine Hossenfelder is on a tear this week, with two excellent and highly provocative pieces about research practice in theoretical physics, a topic on which she has become the field’s most perceptive critic. The first is in this month’s Nature … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
71 Comments
Some Math and Physics Interactions
Quanta magazine has a new article about physicists “attacking” the Riemann Hypothesis, based on the publication in PRL of this paper. The only comment from a mathematician evaluating relevance of this to a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis basically says … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
21 Comments