About
Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations
Not Even Wrong: The Book
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 674 other subscribersRecent Comments
- This Week's Hype, etc. 33
Attendee, Peter Woit, Emil Martinec, Attendee, udi, Peter+Shor [...] - Wick Rotating Weyl Spinor Fields 14
First_Approximation, Peter Woit, anonymous, Peter Woit, TwoBs, Peter Woit [...] - This Week's Hype 7
ohwilleke, Peter Woit, Peter, Peter Woit, Velvet, Peter Woit [...] - (Blinkered) Visions in Quantum Gravity 1
David Brown - The Impossible Man 32
Thomas, Cormac O'Raifeartaigh, Phil H, Matthias, Peter Woit, John Baez [...]
- This Week's Hype, etc. 33
Categories
- abc Conjecture (21)
- Book Reviews (123)
- BRST (13)
- Euclidean Twistor Unification (16)
- Experimental HEP News (153)
- Fake Physics (8)
- Favorite Old Posts (50)
- Film Reviews (15)
- Langlands (52)
- Multiverse Mania (163)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (27)
- Obituaries (35)
- Quantum Mechanics (24)
- Quantum Theory: The Book (7)
- Strings 2XXX (27)
- Swampland (20)
- This Week's Hype (143)
- Uncategorized (1,292)
- Wormhole Publicity Stunts (15)
Archives
Links
Mathematics Weblogs
- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Anton Hilado
- Cathy O'Neil
- Daniel Litt
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- David Roberts
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Harald Helfgott
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Persiflage
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Silicon Reckoner
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers
- Xena Project
Physics Weblogs
- Alexey Petrov
- AMVA4NewPhysics
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Geoffrey Dixon
- Georg von Hippel
- Jacques Distler
- Jess Riedel
- Jim Baggott
- John Horgan
- Lubos Motl
- Mark Goodsell
- Mark Hanman
- Mateus Araujo
- Matt Strassler
- Matt von Hippel
- Matthew Buckley
- Peter Orland
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder
- Scott Aaronson
- Sean Carroll
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Stacy McGaugh
- Tommaso Dorigo
Some Web Pages
- Alain Connes
- Arthur Jaffe
- Barry Mazur
- Brian Conrad
- Brian Hall
- Cumrun Vafa
- Dan Freed
- Daniel Bump
- David Ben-Zvi
- David Nadler
- David Vogan
- Dennis Gaitsgory
- Eckhard Meinrenken
- Edward Frenkel
- Frank Wilczek
- Gerard ’t Hooft
- Greg Moore
- Hirosi Ooguri
- Ivan Fesenko
- Jacob Lurie
- John Baez
- José Figueroa-O'Farrill
- Klaas Landsman
- Laurent Fargues
- Laurent Lafforgue
- Nolan Wallach
- Peter Teichner
- Robert Langlands
- Vincent Lafforgue
Twitter
Videos
Quick Links
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Pingback: Career advice from the Fields medalists and some other mathematicians « Successful Researcher
try this link:
http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen
To stand a chance at “snarXiv vs. arXiv” I would need the abstracts, I guess, with the titles alone I don’t get above 70%.
What got me in the first run was, for example, “non-compact compactification” (that’s probably too absurd to be computer generated).
snarxiv is hilarious. Another one, though more sad (because the posters are completely serious), is viXra.org.
Arnold’s death is really a sad news.
Thanks for pointing out vixra.org – some of that stuff is really entertaining 🙂 and some of it really is serious. That is, it’s not a joke.
-drl
DR,
One of the regulars on that site is a Mister Victor Porton, who believes his math discoveries have earned him the Abel prize:
http://www.mathematics21.org/abel-prize.html
Thanks for the link to snarXiv. One of the papers that got me had “new old inflation” in the title … I figured that one couldn’t possibly be real. Wrong!
When you get 4 out of 4 right it calls you “Nobel Prize winner” and then if you get 5 out of 5 it says “Ed–is that you?”, beyond that I have not tried to go.
Porton’s request reminds me of a Russian beer ad I saw once. I cannot remember the brand, but the poster showed a bottle with the caption: “Buy our beer. We need your money.”
> and then if you get 5 out of 5 it says “Ed–is that you?”
No. The Ed sentence is random for 100% results.
Ed, I only made 5 tries in all and got 5 out of 5, all I know is that is what it said. Didn’t explore further. You could be right.
I got to a Nobel Prize straight off, then got them all wrong after that until I was worse than a monkey.
Another topic:- Witten’s string-twistor marriage is getting an airing at:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=simple-twist-of-fate
Pingback: Ars Mathematica