- The LHC is back in business, with the experiments collecting data at 4 TeV/beam, marginally higher than last year’s 3.5 TeV/beam. They are ramping up the number of bunches in each beam, already this afternoon achieving a higher initial luminosity than the best of late last year. This should be a record luminosity for a [as pointed out by a commenter, hadron] collider. One place to follow the amount of data being accumulated is this CMS page.
- Also in Switzerland, another hard to comprehend publicly funded experiment is going on, see details here.
The Swiss boson is a hypothetical condition which is supposed to account for why the Swiss franc has ‘mass’ when all other neighbouring currencies don’t.
A multi billion-euro experiment, operated by BERN (but funded outright by tax payers), is currently under way on the borders of Switzerland and the Eurozone to try and stamp out the asymmetries, ideally by creating something known as the ‘anti-franc’.
As part of the experiment, highly skilled practitioners smash billions of Swiss francs against the euro currency daily, with the explicit aim of blowing apart the franc.
Experiments to date suggest the boson is probably hiding somewhere in the 1.20-1.22 field. Though some say there’s a chance of finding it at the 1.25 mark.
Yet as the experiment continues, fears grow that a black hole could unwittingly be created in the current account of the nation — a singularity known as the “ever depreciating euro asset” phenomenon.
- Jean-Pierre Serre has a web-page at the Collège de France where one can download copies of many of his recent manuscripts. There’s also a wonderful interview with him here.
- Michio Kaku, the “co-founder of the superstring version of string theory”, gave a talk about the future recently in Yakima, Washington. Clifford Johnson reports on a recent phone conversation he had:
Michio Kaku says that the universe is full of many things and all you have to do is ask for something and you’ll get it. How do you go about doing that?
Well… I am not sure what he had in mind. It might be…. might be best to ask him…. But maybe what he meant is that the universe is a very big place, with lots of things going on, and maybe he meant that there are all sorts of things you could find out there because it is so big and diverse… But perhaps he did not have in mind that a particular person could go out and get any of those things… but you might want to ask him. I can’t say for sure.
Perhaps Clifford should have clarified things for his caller by explaining that it’s only string theorists for whom “the universe is full of many things and all you have to do is ask for something and you’ll get it”.
About
Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations
Not Even Wrong: The Book
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 683 other subscribersRecent Comments
- Several Items 10
Peter Woit, Amitabh Lath, Peter Woit, Curious, Matt+Grayson, David Brown [...] - Competition and Survival in Modern Academia 9
Peter Woit, Jim+Eadon, Marvin, Diogenes, Jakob Schwichtenberg, Alex [...] - Nature Research Intelligence 15
martibal, zzz, Peter Woit, John Baez, Peter Woit, Commenter [...] - Strings 2025 27
Peter Woit, NoGo, Peter Shor, John Baez, Anonymous, clueless_postdoc [...] - A Milestone 10
Luca Signorelli, ohwilleke, CWJ, Pasquale Di Cesare, Kb, Sabine [...]
- Several Items 10
Categories
- abc Conjecture (21)
- Book Reviews (123)
- BRST (13)
- Euclidean Twistor Unification (16)
- Experimental HEP News (153)
- Fake Physics (8)
- Favorite Old Posts (50)
- Film Reviews (15)
- Langlands (52)
- Multiverse Mania (163)
- Not Even Wrong: The Book (27)
- Obituaries (35)
- Quantum Mechanics (24)
- Quantum Theory: The Book (7)
- Strings 2XXX (28)
- Swampland (20)
- This Week's Hype (143)
- Uncategorized (1,297)
- Wormhole Publicity Stunts (15)
Archives
Links
Mathematics Weblogs
- Alex Youcis
- Alexandre Borovik
- Anton Hilado
- Cathy O'Neil
- Daniel Litt
- David Hansen
- David Mumford
- David Roberts
- Emmanuel Kowalski
- Harald Helfgott
- Jesse Johnson
- Johan deJong
- Lieven Le Bruyn
- Mathematics Without Apologies
- Noncommutative Geometry
- Persiflage
- Pieter Belmans
- Qiaochu Yuan
- Quomodocumque
- Secret Blogging Seminar
- Silicon Reckoner
- Terence Tao
- The n-Category Cafe
- Timothy Gowers
- Xena Project
Physics Weblogs
- Alexey Petrov
- AMVA4NewPhysics
- Angry Physicist
- Capitalist Imperialist Pig
- Chad Orzel
- Clifford Johnson
- Cormac O’Raifeartaigh
- Doug Natelson
- EPMG Blog
- Geoffrey Dixon
- Georg von Hippel
- Jacques Distler
- Jess Riedel
- Jim Baggott
- John Horgan
- Lubos Motl
- Mark Goodsell
- Mark Hanman
- Mateus Araujo
- Matt Strassler
- Matt von Hippel
- Matthew Buckley
- Peter Orland
- Physics World
- Resonaances
- Robert Helling
- Ross McKenzie
- Sabine Hossenfelder
- Scott Aaronson
- Sean Carroll
- Shaun Hotchkiss
- Stacy McGaugh
- Tommaso Dorigo
Some Web Pages
- Alain Connes
- Arthur Jaffe
- Barry Mazur
- Brian Conrad
- Brian Hall
- Cumrun Vafa
- Dan Freed
- Daniel Bump
- David Ben-Zvi
- David Nadler
- David Vogan
- Dennis Gaitsgory
- Eckhard Meinrenken
- Edward Frenkel
- Frank Wilczek
- Gerard ’t Hooft
- Greg Moore
- Hirosi Ooguri
- Ivan Fesenko
- Jacob Lurie
- John Baez
- José Figueroa-O'Farrill
- Klaas Landsman
- Laurent Fargues
- Laurent Lafforgue
- Nolan Wallach
- Peter Teichner
- Robert Langlands
- Vincent Lafforgue
Twitter
Videos
The “Swiss boson” article seems to be satirical in nature, Peter. Possibly a belated April Fools’ item.
Visitor,
It’s not an April Fool’s joke, but yes, it’s a satirical comparison of what is going on with the Swiss franc and stories about the Higgs boson. I thought it interesting to see that discussion of the Higgs has gotten so much attention that financial journalists find it a worthwhile topic to use in a satire. Unless you’re pretty well informed about the Higgs, you’re not going to get the joke and find it funny. That the Financial Times thinks much of its readership will get the joke is kind of remarkable.
I usually have negative things to say about M Kaku, but I have just watched the video clip that Peter linked and I must say that he spoke very well in favor of supporting science. He gave a level-headed impression, used the right words and metaphors (no matter how oversimplified) that can make sense to the layman and, hopefully, make a difference.
Peter,
Read the FT piece through to the comments and you’ll see that pulling strings behind the facade of “reality” is taken to be the prerogative of the policy wonk. The text-book is Thomas Hobbes’ and that should not surprise Ye denizens of Ecclesiastical Polity. This is Scientific Materialism as also preached by Galileo from Tertullian.
Peter, see Rabi Mohapatra’s talk at PI. e believes SO(10) has to be right.
http://pirsa.org/12040080/
I have not seen anything so funny on a physics blog in … well, ever.
Ok, so electrons collectively interacting in condensed matter can function on a quantum level as a sort of virtual “Majorana particle” (not the public’s idea of a particle, but never mind that)
Prediction: This 1930s concept will be said to be evidence for string theory by midweek
It is curious that almost all the posts are to laugh at Kaku/string theory but nobody has anything to say about the LHC and the outstanding work at CERN. When claiming a record luminosity, be careful to restrict to hadron colliders. Or else check what the e+e- colliders achieved, for example at the B factories (including CESR). It’s so easy to laugh at or put down other people. It’s so much harder to come up with a positive contribution of one’s own.
luminosity,
Thanks for the correction. You’re right, the LHC has not yet quite reached the luminosity levels achieved at the e+/e- B-factories (they are above CESR, but not PEP-II). I agree with your comment that the progress at the LHC is remarkable and this deserves to be noted and appreciated. Unfortunately, as long as things are going well, the LHC likely won’t produce dramatic news until early July. So, to keep people entertained, the continuing antics of Kaku and the string theorists are one of the few possibilities here.